This omission raised questions about the ongoing tensions between the Royal Family and the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. Many royal watchers felt that this snub was a direct reflection of the strained relationship between the family and the couple, especially after Harry and Meghan‘s decision to step back from royal duties and relocate to California.
However, many were quick to note that there was no direct reference to Prince Harry, Meghan, or their children, despite their prominence in the media. The closest Charles came to acknowledging them was a vague reference to protecting the planet “for the sake of our children’s children,” but this was not a personal message to his own grandchildren.
In the wake of their exclusion from the Christmas festivities, the couple has made it clear that they have no intention of returning to the Royal Family’s fold anytime soon.
Last year, King Charles III made a decision that sparked widespread criticism and raised questions about his relationship with his son, Prince Harry, and his daughter-in-law, Meghan Markle. For the first time, King Charles did not invite Harry, Meghan, or their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, to spend the royal Christmas holiday with the royal family in England.
This decision was met with strong reactions, with many questioning how the King could exclude his two young grandchildren, especially during a season traditionally centered around family and togetherness.
Trailing Trading 212*, Plum* and Moneybox are Monument Bank and Mansfield Building Society which are…
Howard proved to be clutch down the stretch and led the Buckeyes to their first…
Psychological distress The challenges and risks of life at sea were not just physical but…
McDonald’s, Amazon, Meta and American Airlines have also since announced a change to their DEI…
What about the economy?The conflict has also had a "devastating impact" on Gaza's economy, said…
The Bears have so far confirmed that they have interviewed 17 candidates to be their…