Here Are Some Of The Most Surprising Pieces Of Testimony To Emerge From CNN’s $1 Billion Defamation Suit

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Multiple CNN employees testified in court they opposed the network’s decision to issue an apology for the story, with Fuzz Hogan, a senior editor at CNN at the time the segment aired, saying he stood by the story, Fox News reported. (RELATED: ‘Are You Saying I’m Not A Christian?’: Scott Jennings Erupts When CNN Host Uses Religion To Call Jordan Neely ‘Victim’)

Marquardt testified Monday that he found no evidence that Young committed any crimes and later said Young was “a small part of the story,” Fox News reported. Marquardt, at the time CNN’s senior national security correspondent, denied he was “looking to take anyone down.”

CNN did not immediately respond to a request for comment from the Daily Caller News Foundation.

CNN sought to keep the jury from learning about a subsequent raise and promotion to chief national security correspondent that Marquardt received from the network, according to Fox News.

“We gonna nail this Zachary Young mfucker,” Marquart said in an email, according to court documents, with another CNN employee responding “gonna hold you to that, cowboy.”

Story is “full of holes like Swiss cheese,” his colleague replies its “80% emotion 20% obscure fact” pic.twitter.com/NZ1EUMfnbX

An Army major general testified earlier in the proceedings that after CNN’s segment, he would not be willing to hire Young, saying it would be “way too risky” to hire the Navy veteran, according to Fox News.

source